Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Silver Lake IA 04-UDM-1229

Palo Alto County S20T95NR34W 2 mi W of Ayrshire.

Assessment Cycle
2002
Result Period
1998 - 2000
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 0
Trophic
Hypereutrophic
Trend
Stable
Legacy ADBCode
IA 04-UDM-01020-L_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of (1) ISU lake survey in 2000-01, (2) surveys by IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (3) ISU report on lake phytoplankton communities.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A (primary contact recreation uses) are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported."  The Class B(LW) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported."  Fish consumption remain "not assessed."  Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted in 2000 and 2001 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (3) information on phytoplankton communities at Iowa lakes in 2000 from Downing et al.  (2002).   EXPLANATION:  Results of monitoring conducted by ISU in 2000 and 2001 as part of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes suggest that the Class A (primary contact) uses are only "partially supported."  Using the median values from this survey in 2000 and 2001 (approximately six samples), Carlsons's (1977) trophic state indices for total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and secchi depth are 90, 72, and 79, respectively, for Silver Lake.   According to Carlson (1977), these index values place this lake in the upper range of hyper-eutrophic lakes and suggest excessive levels of phosphorus, (2) excessive, but somewhat less than expected, production of suspended algae, and (3) poor water transparency.    These conditions indicate impairments to the Class A (primary contact) uses through presence of aesthetically objectionable blooms of algae and presence of nuisance algal species (i.e., bluegreen algae).   Data from Downing et al.  (2002) suggest that bluegreen algae (Cyanophyta), comprise a significant portion (approximately 35%) of the summertime phytoplankton community of Silver Lake.   Sampling in summer 2000 showed that bluegreen algae comprised approximately 15% of wet mass of the phytoplankton community in the mid-June sample, 55% of the mid-July sample, and 30% of the early August sample.   Based on median values from ISU sampling in 2000 and 2001, the ratio of total nitrogen to total phosphorus for this lake is 8.   Data on inorganic suspended solids from the ISU survey suggest that this lake is also subject to occasional episodes of high levels of non-algal turbidity.   The median level of inorganic suspended solids in the 130 lakes sampled for the ISU lake survey in 2000 and 2001 was 5.27 mg/l.   The median level of inorganic suspended solids at Silver Lake (21.4 mg/l) was the seventh highest of the 130 lakes, thus suggesting that non-algal turbidity may limit the production of algae as well as impair beneficial uses.   Based on this information, turbidity-related impacts to the primary contact and aquatic life uses at this lake will be attributed to both suspended algae and re-suspended inorganic material.   The hyper-eutrophic conditions at this lake, along with information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, suggest that the Class B(LW) aquatic life uses are "partially supported" due to excessive nutrient loading to the water column, nuisance blooms of algae, re-suspension of sediment, and organic enrichment.   Fish consumption remain "not assessed" due to the lack of recent fish contaminant monitoring at this lake.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
7/19/2001 Fixed Monitoring End Date
6/15/2000 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Nutrients Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Organic enrichment/Low DO Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Natural Sources
  • Slight
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Organic enrichment/Low DO Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Natural Sources
  • Slight
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Suspended solids Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Suspended solids Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate