Assessment Comments
Assessment is based on: (1) results of monthly monitoring from 2006 through 2008 at the IDNR/UHL ambient city monitoring station located downstream from Fort Dodge near Kalo (STORET station 10940003), (2) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring near Dolliver State Park in 2005, (3) results of 2006 fish contaminant monitoring conducted as part of the IDNR/UHL REMAP biological monitoring project (REMAP Site 221), and (4) IDNR/UHL stream REMAP biological sampling near Coalville.
Basis for Assessment
[Note 1: Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(WW) aquatic life uses, including fish consumption uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), and due to the completion of a Use Attainability Analysis in 2007, this segment is also now designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses. This segment remains designated for warmwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(WW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses).]
[Note 2: This assessment was also used for the adjacent downstream segment of the Des Moines River (IA 04-UDM-0040-1).]
SUMMARY: The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" based on results of ambient monitoring for indicator bacteria (E. coli). The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of biological monitoring in 2006. Fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2005 and 2006. The sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of monthly monitoring from 2006 through 2008 at the IDNR/UHL ambient city monitoring station located downstream from Fort Dodge near Kalo (STORET station 10940003), (2) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring near Dolliver State Park in 2005, (3) results of 2006 fish contaminant monitoring conducted as part of the IDNR/UHL REMAP biological monitoring project (REMAP Site 221), and (4) IDNR/UHL stream REMAP biological sampling near Coalville in 2006.
EXPLANATION: The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" based on results of monitoring for indicator bacteria (E. coli). The geometric mean level of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 22 samples collected (158 orgs/100ml) during the recreational seasons of 2006 through 2008 exceeds Iowa’s Class A1 water quality criterion of 126 orgs/100ml. Seven of the 22 samples (32%) exceeded Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting, if the geometric mean level of E. coli exceed Iowa’s geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as “not supported” (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S. EPA 1997b).
The ambient WQ monitoring data indicate that the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses should be assessed (monitored) as "fully supported." Ambient chemical/physical monitoring conducted at the IDNR city station from 2006-2008 showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for dissolved oxygen, pH, or ammonia-nitrogen in the 34 samples collected or in the five samples analyzed for toxic metals (including mercury). These results suggest that the Class B(WW1) uses should be assessed as "fully supported."
Contrary to the results of the ambient WQ monitoring, the results from the 2006 IDNR/UHL stream REMAP biological sampling indicate that the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses should be assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported." This evaluated biological assessment was based on data collected in 2006 as part of the DNR/UHL stream REMAP project. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2006 FIBI score was 47 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 34 (fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004. The non-riffle FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 32 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage area (4322 mi2) above this sampling site was greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria. Even though this site passed both the FIBI BIC and failed to meet the BMIBI BIC, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.
This segment of the Des Moines River was sampled as part of the 1998-99 statewide study of freshwater mussels in Iowa streams and rivers (Arbuckle et al. 2000). As part of this study, sampling results from 1998 and 1999 (Arbuckle et al. 2000) were compared to results from stream sites surveyed in 1984 and 1985 by Frest (1987). On a statewide basis, this comparison showed sharp declines in the numbers of mussel species ("species richness") in Iowa streams and rivers from the mid-1980s to the late 1990s. For stream segments having four or more species reported for the 1984-95 survey, results of this comparison were used by staff of the Iowa DNR Water Quality Bureau to assess the degree to which the aquatic life uses of the sampled stream segments are supported. The results of this sampling on the Des Moines River, however, do not meet IDNR guidelines for developing an assessment of support for the aquatic life uses. Species richness of freshwater mussels at the one sample site in this segment was 2 in the 1984-85 period and was 0 in the 1998-99 period, respectively, for percent change of minus 100%. Based on these results, the aquatic life uses are considered “not assessed” due (1) to IDNR’s assessment methodology in which assessment decisions are developed only for those stream segments having an average of four or more species reported in the 1984-85 (Frest) survey and (2) the difficulty of interpreting status of mussel communities showing relatively low species richness during the both the historical (1984-85) and current (1998-99) surveys.
Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Dolliver State Park in 2005 and REMAP monitoring near Coalville in 2006. The 2005 composite samples of fillets from common carp and freshwater drum had low levels of contaminants. Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of common carp fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.183 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of freshwater drum fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.139 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. The September 2006 IDNR/UHL REMAP project (Site 221) fish tissue monitoring showed low levels of the primary contaminants in the composite samples of common carp fillets: mercury: 0.239 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of support of fish consumption uses in Iowa’s rivers and lakes. The fish contaminant data generated from the 2005 RAFT and 2006 REMAP sampling conducted in this assessment segment suggest that levels of all contaminants from this monitoring were below advisory trigger levels, thus suggesting the continued “full support” of fish consumption uses.
