Assessment Comments
Assessment remains based on results of an IDNR investigation of a fish kill in May 2000.
Basis for Assessment
SUMMARY: The general uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on a report of a fish kill in May 2000. Due to the absence of kills subsequent to that kill, this assessment segment will be considered “evaluated” and thus moved from Category 4d (impaired) to Category 3b (water in need of further investigation) of Iowa's 2006 Integrated Report.
EXPLANATION: A fish kill occurred on this stream segment on May 3, 2000. The kill affected approximatley 6 miles of Brushy Creek north of Halbur in Carroll County. The kill started approximately 5 miles NNW of Halbur in Section 23, T84N, R36W and extended approximately 6 miles downstream; an estimated 6,000 fish were killed. The kill was apparently caused by truck wash effluent from a livestock trailer washing operation. The party responsible for the kill was identified, and restitution was sought. According to DNR's assessment methodology for Section 305(b) reporting, occurrence of a single pollution-caused fish kill during the most recent three-year period (2000-02) indicates "partial support" of the aquatic life uses. Thus, the general aquatic life uses of this stream segment were assessed as "partially supported."
According to DNR's assessment methodology for Section 305(b) reporting, occurrence of a single pollution-caused fish kill during an assessment period indicates "partial support" of the aquatic life uses. If, however, a consent order has been issued to the party responsible for the kill and monetary restitution has been sought for the fish killed, the affected waterbody should be placed in IR Category 4d (impaired but TMDL not required). Thus, this assessment segment was placed into Category 4d of Iowa's 2004 Integrated Report. Also, according to IDNR's assessment/listing methodology, if no additional fish kills have occurred over at least a three-year period (i.e., no kills occurred in the period 2002-2004), the assessment of impairment should be considered “evaluated” (i.e., of lower confidence), and the waterbody segment should be moved from IR Category 4d to IR Category 3b (list of waters in need of further investigation).
