Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Pickerel Lake IA 04-RAC-1180

Buena Vista County S1T93NR35W 4 mi NE of Marathon.

Cycle
2022
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Stable
Created
12/29/2021 10:26:56 AM
Updated
2/17/2022 2:47:24 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Fully Supported
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5* - 303(d)-impaired last cycle; fully supporting this cycle; potential de-listing.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2020
Impairment Rationale
Significantly > 10% of samples fail to meet criterion
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
Cycle Added Class Cause Data Source Rationale
2010 Class A1 Algal Growth: Chlorophyll a Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
2010 Class A1 Turbidity: Siltation/Turbidity Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
2010 Class BLW Algal Growth: Chlorophyll a Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
2010 Class BLW Turbidity: Siltation/Turbidity Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed as "fully supported." The Class BLW use was assessed as "not supported" due to violations of the state criteria for Dissolved Oxygen. All other designated uses were “not assessed.”

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2016-2020

22110004

Pickerel Lake

Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data

Class A1 - pH

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22110004

6

21 / 5

7.19

10

8.28

2

5

NO

Monitored

Full

Class A1 - Lake TSI's

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median TSI Violation?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22110004

6

Chlorophyll a TSI

21 / 5

24

90

58

NO

Monitored

Full

22110004

6

Total Phosphorus TSI

21 / 5

61

98

89

NA

NA

NA

22110004

6

Inorganic suspended solids

14 / 3

0.06

449

4.25

NA

NA

NA

  • The TSI value for Secchi depth is not used to evaluate the attainment of aquatic life use in shallow lakes. Due to the depth of these shallow lakes, TSI values for Secchi depth can be misleading. In some instances, the Secchi disk remains visible at the bottom of the lake and the depth of the lake is recorded as the Secchi depth. In these instances, water clarity may be sufficient to support the Class A1 uses, but the index value is limited by the depth of the lake. Thus the combination of total suspended solids and chlorophyll a will be used to determine whether or not the Class A1 and Class BLW uses are impaired in these shallow systems.
  • DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a TSI value less than or equal to 63 are necessary to suggest de-listing of an impairment. The chlorophyll a TSI value for the 2010 assessment listing cycle was 78, which based on DNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment based on the narrative criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions. Because the TSI value for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 65 (2020 listing for chlorophyll a was 57), and because the TSI value for the current listing cycle is also 58, based on DNR's methodology, these values suggest "full support" of the Class A1 and Class BLW uses protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for chlorophyll a is suggested for delisting for the 2022 assessment/listing cycle.

Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

# Acute / Chronic Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22110004

6

Ammonia

16 / 4

0.012

0.357

0.08

NA

0 / 0

4

NO

Monitored

Full

22110004

6

Dissolved Oxygen

21 / 5

0.46

16.86

8.15

4

NA / NA

5

NO

Monitored

Full

22110004

6

pH

21 / 5

7.19

10

8.28

2

NA / NA

5

NO

Monitored

Full

22110004

6

Temperature

21 / 5

14.5

27.2

21.9

0

NA / NA

5

NO

Monitored

Full

According to DNR's methodology, a river must meet water quality standards for two consecutive cycles to suggest de-listing.Therefore, Pickerel Lake will remain listed for the 2022 cycle as "not supported" its Class BLW uses due to dissolved oxygen.

Class BLW - Protection of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median Value = SAV

Assessment Type

Support Level

22110004

6

Total suspended solids

21 / 5

1

614.5

12

NO

Monitored

Full

  • Guidelines for wetland assessment from the Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee’s Water Quality Technical Section (2003) state that an average total suspended solids concentration during the growing season of less than 30 mg/L is necessary to provide sufficient water clarity to support the growth of submersed aquatic vegetation in wetlands and shallow lakes. High levels of total suspended solids impede the growth of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV). Submersed aquatic vegetation is critical to the health of wetland and shallow lake ecosystems. The elimination of SAV can degrade habitat quality such that undesirable aquatic species such as cyanobacteria, common carp and fathead minnows dominate. As such, the suppression of SAV constitutes a violation of Iowa’s narrative water quality criteria protecting against undesirable or nuisance aquatic life.
  • DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a median growing season total suspended solids concentration of 30 mg/L to suggest de-listing of the SAV impairment. The total suspended solids concentration for the 2010 assessment listing cycle was 45, which based on DNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment. Because the total suspended solids concentration for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 30 (2020 listing for SAV was 12), and because the total suspended solids concentration for the current listing cycle is also 12, based on DNR's methodology, these values suggest "full support" of the Class A1 and Class BLW uses protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for SAV is suggested for delisting for the 2022 assessment/listing cycle.

Class HH: No Data

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
5/17/2016
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
6/16/2020
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)