Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

North River IA 04-LDM-1097

from Co. Rd. R-63 (S16 T77N R24W Warren Co.) to confluence with Badger Cr. in S33 T77N R25W Warren Co.

Assessment Cycle
2010
Result Period
2006 - 2008
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5b-t
Legacy ADBCode
IA 04-LDM-0300_2
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Not supporting
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) results of IDNR/UHL biological (REMAP) monitoring in 2002, (2) IDNR/UHL biological (Biocriteria) monitoring in 1999, 2001 & 2004, and (3) results of IDNR/UHL ambient monthly water quality monitoring during the 2006-2008 assessment period at STORET station 10910002 (formerly station 426058) at the County Road R27 bridge SE of Norwalk.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(WW) aquatic life uses, including fish consumption uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), and due to the completion of a Use Attainability Analysis, this segment is also now designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.   This segment remains designated for warmwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(WW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses)).]

SUMMARY:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria that violate state water quality criteria.   The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported” based on results of biological monitoring in 2002 and 2004.   Fish consumption uses are "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this river segment.   The sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of IDNR/UHL biological (REMAP) monitoring in 2002, (2) IDNR/UHL biological (Biocriteria) monitoring in 1999, 2001 and 2004, and (3) results of IDNR/UHL ambient monthly water quality monitoring during the 2006-2008 assessment period at STORET station 10910002 (formerly station 426058) at the County Road R27 bridge SE of Norwalk.  

EXPLANATION:  The Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" based on results of ambient monitoring for indicator bacteria (E.   coli).   The geometric mean level of indicator bacteria (E.   coli) in the 21 samples collected (744 orgs/100ml) far exceeds the Iowa Class A1 water quality criterion of 126 orgs/100ml.   Twelve of the 21 samples (57%) exceed Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.   According to U.S.  EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and according to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean level of E.   coli is greater than the state criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S.  EPA 1997b).  

The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” based on results of biological monitoring conducted in 1999, 2001, 2002 and 2004 as part of IDNR/UHL biocriteria and REMAP projects.   A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 1999 BMIBI score was 53 (fair) and the 2001 BMIBI score was 26 (poor).   The 2002 REMAP FIBI score was 29 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 56 (good).   The 2004 biocriteria FIBI score was 24 (poor) and the BMIBI score was 65 (good).   The aquatic life use support was assessed as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports.   The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 36 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 51.   This segment passed the FIBI BIC 0/2 times in the last seven years and passed the BMIBI BIC 3/4 times i nthe last 10 years.   This stream segment continues to exhibit movement into, and out of, the range of impairment of aquatic life uses especially the FIBI scores.  

This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology.   IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years between 2004 and 2008 to be considered “monitored”.   This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous 10 years (1999-2008); however, the multiple samples were not collected during 2004-2008.   According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report).   IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).   However, despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 5b and remains on Iowa’s 2010 Section 303(d) list of impaired waters.  

Despite the results of biological monitoring that show aquatic life uses to be only "partially supported," results of chemical/physical monitoring in this river segment continue to show relatively good water quality.   None of the 34 samples collected during the 2006-2008 assessment period at this IDNR monthly ambient station violated Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for pH, dissolved oxygen, or ammonia-nitrogen.   Also, no violations have occurred in the two samples analyzed for toxic metals during the 2006-2008 period.    

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
12/11/2008 Fixed Monitoring End Date
1/3/2006 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/23/2004 Biological Monitoring
7/16/2002 Biological Monitoring
9/19/2001 Biological Monitoring
10/15/1999 Biological Monitoring
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
420 Water column surveys (e.g. fecal coliform)
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 3
Pathogen Indicators 3
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 3
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Slight
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Natural Sources
  • Slight
  • Slight
  • Slight
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Slight
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Slight
  • Slight
Turbidity Aquatic Life Support Slight
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Natural Sources
  • Slight
  • Slight
  • Slight
Pathogens Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate