Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Camp Creek IA 04-LDM-1070

mouth (S7 T77N R21W Marion Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary in S14 T79N R22W Polk Co.

Cycle
2016
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
4 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL has been completed or is not needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
9/2/2016 12:53:44 PM
Updated
10/18/2016 4:00:23 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Assessed
Class BWW2
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 2
Partially Supported
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
High
Status
Continuing
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain “not assessed” (IR 3a) due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.  The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR 4a) based on results of biological sampling conducted in 2005 and 2009 as part of the IDNR/SHL stream biocriteria project.  A TMDL for this impairment was prepared and was approved by U.S. EPA in 2005.  The available water quality data for this assessment segment were collected more than 10 years ago and are thus of questionable use for characterizing current water quality conditions in Camp Creek.  Please see previous assessments for water quality assessments that were based on these data.  

Assessment Explanation

[Note 1:  A TMDL for siltation and nutrients in this segment of Camp Creek was prepared by IDNR and approved by EPA in 2005.  Because the Section 303(d) impairments identified for the 2006 assessment/listing cycle are believed addressed by the TMDL, this waterbody is placed into IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).] 

[Note 2:  Although IDNR/SHL monitoring was conducted in this segment during the 2004-2006 assessment period, only three samples were collected and analyzed.  These samples were collected at IDNR/SHL TMDL stations 11770001 and 11770002.  In addition, a sample was collected at IDNR/SHL TMDL station 11770005 near Mitchellville.  None of the three samples violated the respective Class B(WW2) criteria for ammonia, dissolved oxygen, or pH.  This amount of data is insufficient for developing an updated assessment of support of designated uses.] 

The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting based on results of biological sampling in 2005 and 2009.  The previous assessment of support for the Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses of this stream ("partially supported") was based on the results of IDNR biological sampling in November 1990 that suggested lower than expected diversity of aquatic life in this stream segment (see assessment developed for the 1998 report).  Results of follow-up biological and chemical monitoring conducted during the 2000-2001 biennial period suggested that, despite relatively good chemical water quality, the status of the biological community continued to suggest an impairment of the Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses. 

Results of biological sampling conducted in 2005 and 2009 as part of Section 305(b) follow-up activities suggested evaluated "partial support" of the Class B(WW2) uses.  A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.  The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach.  The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).  The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).  The 2005 FIBI scores from the lower two TMDL sites located in the 47f ecoregion were 25 (poor), 39 (fair) and the BMIBI scores were 74, 75 (good).  The 2009 FIBI scores from the lower two TMDL sites located in the 47f ecoregion were 31, 39 (fair) and the BMIBI scores were 59, 68 (good).  The 47f FIBI BIC is 36 and the 47f BMIBI BIC is 51.  The upper biological sampling site is located in Thomas Mitchell County Park and is in the 47b ecoregion.  The upper site 2005 FIBI score was 30 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 73 (good).  The upper site 2009 FIBI score was 32 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 59 (good).  The 47b riffle habitat FIBI BIC is 53 and the 47b BMIBI BIC is 62.  The aquatic life use support was assessed as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports.  This segment passed the FIBI BICs 2/6 times and passed the BMIBI BICs 5/6 times from 2005-2009.  The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. 

These data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence). 

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/9/2009
Biological Monitoring
9/8/2009
Biological Monitoring
7/21/2005
Biological Monitoring
7/20/2005
Biological Monitoring
7/19/2005
Biological Monitoring
Methods
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
315
Regional reference site approach
320
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330
Fish surveys
380
Quantitative physical habitat assessment