Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Walnut Creek IA 04-LDM-1069

mouth (S24 T77N R21W Marion Co.) to headwaters in NE1/4 SE30 T79N R21W Jasper Co.

Assessment Cycle
2014
Result Period
2010 - 2012
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-1)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 3b-u
Legacy ADBCode
IA 04-LDM-0227_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on UHL/IGSB biological (fish) monitoring data in 2004 and 2005: FIBI = 22 (poor) and 29 (fair). FIBI BIC = 36.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was classified only for general uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008, this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and for Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.   According to the Iowa Water Quality Standards, all perennial rivers and streams and all intermittent streams with perennial pools that are not specifically listed in the Iowa surface water classification are designated as Class A1 and Class B(WW1) waters.   Thus, for the current assessment, perennial flow is presumed, and the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW1) water quality criteria.]

SUMMARY/EXPLANATION:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" (IR 3a) due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.  

The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “partially supporting” (3b-u) based on biological data collected in 2004 and 2005 as part of the IGSB/SHL stream biological monitoring project.   A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of fish species collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI).   The index ranks the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2004 FIBI score was (poor) and the 2005 FIBI score was 29 (fair).   The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI score with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008.   The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 36.   This segment passed the FIBI BIC 0/2 times in the last nine years.   Even though this site failed to meet the FIBI BIC, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it is a small general use stream and doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.  

According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report).   IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).  

Prior to the changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008, this stream was classified only for general uses due to the inability of the stream to support a viable aquatic community at low-flow conditions.   IDNR’s existing biological assessment protocol, however, was calibrated to aquatic life reference conditions in larger wadeable streams with perennial flow.   The aquatic environment of most headwater streams is one of extremes in water quality.   Consequently, intermittent headwater streams tend to have biological diversity that is low relative to more stable aquatic environments of larger streams with perennial flow.   Thus, the use of biological assessment methods developed for the ecologically more stable and diverse streams will likely overstate the existence of impairment in headwater streams.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/19/2005 Biological Monitoring
9/21/2004 Biological Monitoring
Methods
315 Regional reference site approach
330 Fish surveys
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
Monitoring Levels
Biological 2
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 2
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Cause Unknown Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Source Unknown
  • Not Impairing