Muchakinock Creek IA 04-LDM-1049
from confluence with Little Muchakinock Cr. (S34 T75N R16W Mahaska Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary in NW 1/4 SW 1/4 S27 T76N R17W Mahaska Co.
- Cycle
- 2018
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 5/14/2019 2:34:57 PM
- Updated
- 8/1/2019 2:40:30 PM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "not supported" based on results of DNR/SHL biological sampling in 2000 and 2011.
The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “not supporting” based on biological data collected in 2000 and 2011 as part of the DNR/SHL stream biocriteria project. A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2000 FIBI score was 5 (poor) and the 2011 FIBI score was 2 (poor). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as not supporting (=NS), based on a comparison of the FIBI score with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 36. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 0/2 times in the last 17 years. This aquatic life assessment is considered "evaluated" because there were not two or more samples collected from this segment in multiple years over a recent five-year period. According to DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). DNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation). However, despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody was previously on Iowa’s Section 303(d) list and thus remains on Iowa’s Section 303(d) list of impaired waters.