Assessment Comments
Assessment remains based on 2003 and 2010 IDNR/SHL biological sampling data: FIBI = 20 (poor) and 63 (good); BMIBI = 39 (fair). FIBI BIC = 33; BMIBI BIC = 41.
Basis for Assessment
[Note: Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(LR) aquatic life uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008, this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses. The stream remains designated for aquatic life uses (now termed Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses). Thus, for the current assessment, the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW2) water quality criteria.]
SUMMARY: The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" (IR 3a) due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The support level of the Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR 3b-c) based on 2003 and 2010 biological sampling conducted as part of the IDNR/SHL stream biocriteria project.
EXPLANATION: The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “partially supporting” based on data collected in 2003 and 2010 as part of the IDNR/SHL stream biocriteria project. The 2010 FIBI score was 63 (good) and the BMIBI score was 39 (fair). The 2003 FIBI score was 20 (poor) and the BMIBI score was not calculated due to the severe low number of organisms collected during the sampling. The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 33 and the BMIBI BIC is 41. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 1/2 times and passed the BMIBI BIC 1/1 times (using the BMIBI UAV of 8 points applied to single samples) in the last 10 years.
This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology. IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment over a recent five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple FIBI samples collected in the previous 10 years (2003-2010); however, the multiple samples were not collected during a recent five-year period. According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).
In addition, this assessment was also categorized as "evaluated" because of the sampling conditions in 2003. This site is a reference site for the 40a ecoregion and has historically been assessed as "fully supporting". During the 2003 sampling visit, a bankfull/out of bank flood event less than one week prior, and was documented as a reason for the overall low aquatic abundance. From the 2003 Lick Creek field sheets: "Poor catch may be related to high (overbank) flow about a week prior to sampling. High (overbank) flows had occurred about a week prior to sampling. Much of the rock was clean (scoured & redeposited). Colonization was light in all habitats.” This reference site will be sampled again in the near future.
