Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Lake Miami IA 04-LDM-1016

Monroe County S20T73NR17W 5 mi. SE of Lovilia.

Assessment Cycle
2002
Result Period
1998 - 2000
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 0
Trophic
Hypereutrophic
Trend
Stable
Legacy ADBCode
IA 04-LDM-00270-L_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Threatened
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of (1) ISU lake survey in 2000-01, (2) surveys by IDNR Fisheries Bureau (3) ISU report on lake phytoplankton communities, and (4) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue monitoring in 2001.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supporting" due to presence of non-algal turbidity, aesthetically objectionable blooms of algae, and presence of nuisance algal species (i.e., bluegreen algae).   The Class B(LW) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supporting / threatened."  Fish consumption uses are "fully supported."  The sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted in 2000 and 2001 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, (3) information on phytoplankton communities at Iowa lakes in 2000 from Downing et al.  (2002), and (4) results of U.S.  EPA / IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring in 2001.   EXPLANATION:  Results from the ISU statewide survey of Iowa lakes suggest that high levels of algal and non-algal turbidity may adversely affect the Class A and Class B(LW) uses of Lake Miami.   Using the median values from this survey in 2000 and 2001 (approximately six samples), Carlson's (1977) trophic state indices for total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and secchi depth are 79, 62, and 72, respectively.   According to Carlson (1977), the index values for total phosphorus and secchi depth place this lake in the range of hyper-eutrophic lakes; the index value for secchi depth is in the lower range between eutrophic and hyper-eutrophic lakes.   These index values suggest excessive levels of phosphorus in the water column, moderately low (and less than expected) production of suspended algae, and poor water transparency.   The median level of inorganic suspended solids in the 130 lakes sampled for the ISU lake survey in 2000 and 2001 was 5.27 mg/l.   Of 130 lakes sampled, Lake Miami had the 23rd highest median level of inorganic suspended solids (15.3 mg/l), thus suggesting that non-algal turbidity limits the production of algae as well as contributes to impairments of both the primary contact recreation and aquatic life uses.   These conditions indicate potential impairments to the Class A (primary contact) uses through presence of (1) non-algal turbidity, (2) aesthetically objectionable blooms of algae, and (3) presence of nuisance algal species (i.e., bluegreen algae).   Data from Downing et al.  (2002) suggest that bluegreen algae (Cyanophyta) dominate the summertime phytoplankton community of Lake Miami).   Sampling in 2000 showed the percent wet mass of bluegreens ranged from approximately 100% in the late June sampling to approximately 85% in the late July and late August samplings.   Based on median values from ISU sampling in 2000 and 2001, the ratio of total nitrogen to total phosphorus for this lake is 10.   Additional data for this lake are being generated as part of the ongoing ISU lake survey; these data will be used to improve the accuracy of future water quality assessments.   Information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau suggests that the Class B(LW) aquatic life uses should remain assessed as "fully supported / threatened.   Fish consumption uses were assessed as "fully supported" based on results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring at Lake Miami in 2001.   Levels of all contaminants in composite samples of fillets from channel catfish and largemouth bass were below one-half of the respective U.S.  FDA action levels and IDNR levels of concern.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/24/2001 Biological Monitoring
7/31/2001 Fixed Monitoring End Date
6/29/2000 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
260 Fish tissue analysis
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Noxious aquatic plants Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Nutrients Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Nutrients Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Suspended solids Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Suspended solids Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Turbidity Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Turbidity Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing