Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

East Fork Des Moines River IA 04-EDM-1882

from County Road B63 (aka 130th) (S23 T94N R29W Kossuth Co) to outfall of the Algona wastewater treatment plant (WWTP)

Assessment Cycle
2012
Release Status
Final
Result Period
2008 - 2010
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-1) Class HH
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 4a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 04-EDM-0010_3
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Not supporting
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) results from the IDNR ambient monthly monitoring station from 2008 through 2010 near St. Joseph in Kossuth County (STORET station 10550001), (2) results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring conducted in 2001-2003 and 2008, and (3) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Algona in 2002 and 2008.

Basis for Assessment

[Note 1:  Prior to the 2004 assessment, this segment was referred to as IA 04-EDM-0010_2.   It was broken into two segments, now listed as IA 04-EDM-0010_2 and IA 04-EDM-0010_3 to reflect the location descriptions and classifications as described in the Surface Water Classification.   All previous assessments referring to the original segment (IA 04-EDM-0010_2) can now be found listed in the documentation for segment IA 04-EDM-0010_3.]

[Note 2:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this river segment was designated only for Class B(WW) aquatic life uses, including fish consumption uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008, and due to the completion of a Use Attainability Analysis in 2007,this segment is also now designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.   This segment remains designated for warmwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(WW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses).]

SUMMARY:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" due to high levels of indicator bacteria (E.  coli).   The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR 3b) based on results of biological monitoring in 2001-2003 and 2008 and on results of chemical/physical monitoring from 2006-2008.   Fish consumption uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2002.   The sources of data for this assessment include (1) results from the IDNR ambient monthly monitoring station from 2008 through 2010 near St.  Joseph in Kossuth County (STORET station 10550001), (2) results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring conducted in 2001-2003 and 2008, and (3) results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Algona in July 2002 and 2008.  

[Note 3:  A TMDL for indicator bacteria (E.  coli) was prepared by IDNR and approved by EPA in January 2009.   Thus, the bacteria impairment for this segment is placed in IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).]

EXPLANATION:  The Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" based on results of ambient monitoring for indicator bacteria (E.  coli).   The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E.  coli) in the 21 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2008 through 2010 at IDNR station 10550001 near St.  Joseph were as follows:  the 2008 geometric mean was 182 orgs/100 ml, the 2009 geometric mean was 196 orgs/100 ml and the 2010 geometric mean was 219 orgs/100 ml.   All three geometric means slightly exceed the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml.   Eight of the 21 samples (38%) exceeded the Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.   According to U.S.  EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean exceeds the respective water quality criterion, the contact recreation uses are "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S.  EPA 1997b).   Thus, because at least one recreation season geometric mean exceeded criteria for Class A1 uses, these uses are assessed as “impaired.”  

The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “partially supporting” based on data collected in 2001-2003 and 2008 as part of the IDNR/UHL stream ambient biological and REMAP sampling projects.   A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2003 FIBI score was 48 (fair) and the 2001-2003 and 2008 BMIBI scores were 62, 67, 59 (good) and 48 (fair).   The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of biological data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The non-riffle habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 32 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62.   This segment passed the FIBI BIC 1/1 times in 2003 and passed the BMIBI BIC 2/4 times in the last 10 years.   This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage areas (977 and 927 mi2) above the sampling sites was greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria.   Even though this site passed the FIBI and failed the BMIBI BIC, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.  

This aquatic life assessment is also now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology.   IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a five-year period to be considered “monitored”.    This segment had multiple BMIBI samples collected in the previous 10 years (2001-2010); however, the samples were not collected during the most recent five-year period.   According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report).   IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).  

Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring also suggest full support of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.   None of the approximately 30 samples collected during the 2008-2010 assessment period violated Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for dissolved oxygen, pH, or ammonia-nitrogen.    

Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Algona in 2002 and 2008.   The composite samples of fillets from channel catfish and walleye in 2002 had low levels of contaminants.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of channel catfish fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.069 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of walleye fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.154 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Follow-up sampling of walleye was conducted in 2008.   The level of mercury in the composite sample of walleye fillets in 2008 was 0.14 ppm.   The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.   The fish contaminant data generated from the 2008 RAFT sampling conducted at this river show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
12/15/2010 Fixed Monitoring End Date
9/17/2008 Biological Monitoring
9/5/2008 Fish Tissue Monitoring
1/15/2008 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
8/25/2003 Biological Monitoring
10/21/2002 Biological Monitoring
7/29/2002 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/20/2001 Biological Monitoring
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
420 Water column surveys (e.g. fecal coliform)
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
260 Fish tissue analysis
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 3
Pathogen Indicators 3
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 2
BioIntegrity Good
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Cause Unknown Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Source Unknown
  • Not Impairing
Pathogens Primary Contact Recreation Slight
  • Source Unknown
  • Slight